Like any other CIO, Brian Googled “Systems Integration Solution” and came up with over 10 million results. While various organizations offered “system integrators solutions” with different services and a current approach, the most difficult task was choosing the perfect option that meets his company’s demands.
Here are the 10 things that would help choose the perfect option.
1. In general, having SIs implement a WMS will be less expensive than using consultants from WMS vendors. This is especially true if the system integrator has many consultants working in India or other low-cost locations, and deployments employ both onshore and offshore people.
2. Before embarking on a full-scale project, the System Integrator should suggest an assessment exercise on the existing IT landscape of applications, including tool appraisal. A full examination of the existing IT environment with a system architectural background should be conducted. Assessment feedback should be offered with observations, recommendations, a roadmap, and eventually an implementation plan.
3. The majority of integration project expenses stem from hiring in-house integration skills to run the projects or hiring external consultants to help. The tools and technologies needed to develop the integrations, on the other hand, come at a high cost. You may expect to pay a high amount for iPaaS tools that cover everything from setting and administering your APIs to master data management. That upfront expense is enormous, given the benefit you might gain immediately.
4. You should be aware of the numerous advantages that firms enjoy, as well as how reliable the solution is to manage further expansions and features. The stability element should place a greater emphasis on solid solutions for other businesses. System integrators should be steady and competitive in the market by displaying successful projects they have undertaken in the past.
5. One should consider the entire knowledge of the system integrator, as well as the product’s quality and efficiency. In their journey, they should have handled numerous domains and use cases. They should wow you with a strong portfolio demonstrating their ability to operate on a highly scalable design. They should be able to present high-level strategy and solution approaches to demonstrate that they are the right individuals for the task.
6. Persistence also pays off from the standpoint of the packager. Packagers are hesitant to start from scratch with a new integrator for each project.
7. After cost, prior project success was their most critical criterion for picking a system integrator. It was tied in the study with packaging knowledge and far ahead of technical resources and general technical abilities.
8. They should have a track record of successfully implementing complicated system integrations in a complex setting. They must provide evidence of such approaches and procedures used in previous projects.
9. System integrators should always be prepared to meet with the organization for a lengthy period of time to demonstrate the capabilities of a wide range of suggested tools for the planned project and to answer all of your system integration queries.
10. Despite SaaS and cloud-based alternatives, system integrators say that WMS installations in complicated warehouse settings are not becoming any faster. These implementations continue to take 9 months or more.
For the demonstration, a specific use case must be chosen, and the findings must be presented to the organization.
As a result of the analysis, the chosen tools should be compared based on their advantages and disadvantages based on their percentage of success for the use case, reusability, scalability, data accuracy, and ease of understanding deployment strategies, coding techniques, maintenance aspects, along with implementation time and cost.
